I agree with Daniel's thought. DNS Discovery and Auto-registration can be handled either in a single document or two separate documents. The important thing is to decide if RA-based approach for DNS discovery is selected as dnsop item or not. During the open discussion, I believe, it will be decided. :-)
/Jaehoon --- Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Hi, > > >It's good to see a DNS discovery method for a > statelessly autoconfiguring > >network back on the table. > > It will be deeply discussed at today meeting. > > >I think the two functions should be in separate > documents. It would be nice > >to push through the DNS discovery method, and not > have it dependent on the > >registration aspect (which many hosts will not > need). > > So. two kinds of drafts will be discussed such as > > 1) IPv6 DNS Discovery aspect > 2) IPv6 DNS Autoregistration aspect > > Also above aspects can be merged into one document I > guess. > > Let's discuss at today meeting > > > > > > > > Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) > Mobile Platform Lab. Samsung Electronics > TEL:+82-31-200-4508 FAX:+82-31-200-3147 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
