--- Masataka Ohta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jaehoon; > > > Beforehand, I'd like to summarize my talk for > today's > > discussion about DNS Discovery and > Autoconfiguration. > > Autoconfiguration, as expected by IPv6 folds, is > just impossible > that it is a pity that DNSOP WG is contaminated. > > Autoconfiguration is easy on a single link isolated > from the > Internet. But, that's all. > At least, DNS discovery based on RA is easy and necessary in IPv6 wired and wireless networks connected to the Internet, I believe. Especially, in the environments where IPv6 address configuration is performed by IPv6 stateless address autoconf, such as HMIPv6 and NEMO, RA-based DNS Discovery is faster than DHCPv6-based DNS Discovery. IMHO, both DHCPv6-based approach and RA-based approach are necessary, depending on the situations, just like IPv6 address autoconfiguration.
/Jaehoon > Masataka Ohta > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
