But there was an explicit section that was concerning "Requirements" (section 2). Perhaps that section should be revised ?
To my mind we still do not have a clear statement of what are the requirements. Some were presented by Rob Austein and Bob Hinden, but there has been nor a vote, neither a draft. Luc > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Masataka Ohta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoye : mardi 29 juillet 2003 04:08 > A : BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE > Cc : Michael Richardson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: proposal for a compromise on DNS discovery > > > Luc; > > > There was a analysis made by the DNS Discovery Design Team > in march 2001 > > (draft-ietf-ipnwg-dns-discovery-01.txt). Wouldn't it be > valuable to go > > on or to restart such a work ? (instead of this no-end > battle?) I must > > have missed something concerning this old work. > > What has been missing is a clear definition on the requirement. > > Lacking it, IPv6 WG has been poorly managed that its past work > is not only useless but also harmful. > > Masataka Ohta > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
