Luc,

At the top of page 2 of draft-ietf-ipngwg-dns-discovery-01.txt is the sentence:

   There are any number of ways that IPv6 hosts can discover information
   required to enable name resolution, in the absence of a DHCP server.

which I read to mean that the document is explicitly describing mechanisms
that do not use DHCP.  Section 6.1 simply suggests the use of DHCP message
formats in a new protocol for use between a host and a DNS server.

draft-ietf-ipngwg-dns-discovery-01.txt expired in September, 2001. The most recent version, draft-ietf-ipv6-dns-discovery-06.txt, which describes the reserved site-local address mechanism, expired in February, 2003. The latter document also, indirectly, assumes that DHCP is not available.

- Ralph


At 01:56 PM 7/29/2003 +0200, BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
Hi Raplh,

thank you for that precision.

draft-ietf-ipngwg-dns-discovery-01.txt had a whole section (6.1 DHCP)
concerning DHCP. But It seems some other points could also be added to
section 5 (Transport Mechanisms) so as to refer explicitly to DHCP.

Do you think it would be valuable to work again on that draft?

Luc

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ralph Droms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> What was missing in the original DNS discovery work is that
> it explicitly ruled out DHCPv6 a priori...
>
> - Ralph
>
> At 05:03 PM 7/28/2003 +0200, BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
> >
> >Then what is(are) the solution(s):
> >- RA-based
> >- DHCPv6-lite
> >- Anycast Addresses for resolver DNS server
> >- SLP (I also like SLP, which already a RFC - Standards
> Track - !!! Does
> >anybody have a good point against SLP ?)
> >- well-known link-local addresses (+ DNS proxies...)?...
> >
> >There was a analysis made by the DNS Discovery Design Team
> in march 2001
> >(draft-ietf-ipnwg-dns-discovery-01.txt). Wouldn't it be
> valuable to go
> >on or to restart such a work ? (instead of this no-end
> battle?) I must
> >have missed something concerning this old work. Could anyone give me
> >some pointers or summary?
> >
> >Luc
> >
> >#------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ># To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> #-------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>

#---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Reply via email to