On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 07:22:13AM -0400, John Schnizlein wrote: > > Since there is a protocol (DCHPv6) which can provide the necessary > information for hosts, and since the "heavy-weight" concerns attributed > to that protocol have been shown invalid (existence proof: DHPCv6-light), > justification for developing a new protocol (or extension of RA) must meet > the burden identified in Architectural Principle 3.2
By that argument, we would not have IPv6 stateless autoconf at all? Tim #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
