At Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:47:24 +0900, Jaehoon Jeong wrote: > > 1. Do you mean that RA-based DNS Discovery is out of scope in DNSOP wg?
I have already answered this question, more than once: Discussion of new protocol extensions (such as your draft) will be in scope (for some WG, probably not DNSOP) if and only if the requirements discussion concludes that there's a gap between real requirements and existing protocols. Serious question, not intended as sarcasm: is there some part of the previous sentence which you do not understand? > 2. Do you think that DHCPv6-lite is necessary in the environment where DHCPv6 exists? > > For the second question, IMHO, in such a case, DHCPv6-lite is unnecessary. > RA-based approach seeks to harmonize with DHCPv6. DHCPv6-lite is a subset of DHCPv6; therefore, by definition, if one has DHCPv6, one also has DHCPv6-lite, and a DHCPv6-lite client doesn't care whether the server(s) that answer it are DHCPv6 or DHCPv6-lite. #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
