Ota-san titled his draft "..Broken.." and did not define the term. I sense your outrage, but abusive does not fit well within what I was reading from Ota-san. If he so choses, he may change the text of his draft.
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 05:07:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > please define the term "broken" > > How about abusive? > > Domain Name: BOSS.COM > Organization: > Boss Game Studios > Colin Gordon > 15400 NE 90th ST Suite 300 > Redmond, WA 98052 > US > Phone: 425-556-0440 > Fax..: 425-556-0547 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Registrar Name....: Register.com > Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com > Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com > > Created on..............: Tue, Sep 14, 1993 > Expires on..............: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 > Record last updated on..: Tue, Mar 11, 2003 > > They were hit by W32/Sobig-A (envelope sender used was "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") > so they decided to remove NS/MX/A records. The domain still belongs to > them according to whois. > > Now do a A lookup on boss.com > I'd clearly say this is abusive domain hijacking and it's on purpose. > And probably boss.com is not the only domains abused that way. > > \Maex > > -- > SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 > Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 > "The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally > proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin" > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
