Bill;
As a non native user of English, I have no strong opinion on
terminologies but want to use plain English.
> Ota-san titled his draft "..Broken.."
> and did not define the term. I sense your outrage,
> but abusive does not fit well within what I was reading
> from Ota-san. If he so choses, he may change the text
> of his draft.
As you seem to know the definition of "abusive", can you please
explain it to me?
To me, "broken" is a plain English word with no further explanation
required, "abusive" is not and is rather pedantic.
> but abusive does not fit well within what I was reading
> from Ota-san.
Are you saying you think "broken" fits well and you still need
a definition on it?
Masataka Ohta
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
