> My impression is different: The rough consensus is to just use DHCPv6 > as the protocol - either the "light" stateless subset in the router, > or the statefull server. There seems to be a small but vocal set of > people who want to invent something new rather than use the v6 variant > of the dynamic host configuration protocol that is known to work.
Well, as it is, it is up to the chairs (by RFC2418) to decide what the consensus is.
Currently, at least, I don't agree with this characterization of rough consensus.
Likewise.
Bob
#---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
