>
> The problem with this argument is that it's a slippery slope. It sounds
> totally reasonable to say, "As long as we have X, we might as well
> include Y." However, the address(es) of the recursive name servers
> aren't that useful without a search list. Then, once you get into a
> windows environment you really need the netbios name server address....
> etc. Once you get done with that, you've invented something that looks
> an awful lot like dhcp.
>

completely agree.
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Reply via email to