>>>>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 03:32:25 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Please see draft-ietf-dhc-.txt, which is
>> in IETF last call. It gives the subset of DHCPv6 that must be implemented
>> for host configuration without address assignment.
>> "another process on the server side" is an implementation detail. Because
>> the DHCPv6 function for host configuration maintains no dynamic per-client
>> state, the code can, in fact, be implemented as code that is executed in
>> the same way as router solicitation code. I strongly believe, based on
>> implementation experience, that the implementation complexity of DHCPv6
>> for host configuration is *not* prohibitive.
(I forgot to mention one important thing in my previous response)
I also strongly believe, *based on my implementation experience*, that
the implementation complexity of DHCPv6 for host configuration is
*not* prohibitive. Of course, this is just a subjective impression,
but I believe the implementation complexity should be measured by
implementors, not (mainly) by protocol designers who do not implement
it.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
