Hi,
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 03:32:25 +0900,
> >>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> Please see draft-ietf-dhc-.txt, which is
> >> in IETF last call. It gives the subset of DHCPv6 that
> must be implemented
> >> for host configuration without address assignment.
>
> >> "another process on the server side" is an implementation
> detail. Because
> >> the DHCPv6 function for host configuration maintains no
> dynamic per-client
> >> state, the code can, in fact, be implemented as code that
> is executed in
> >> the same way as router solicitation code. I strongly
> believe, based on
> >> implementation experience, that the implementation
> complexity of DHCPv6
> >> for host configuration is *not* prohibitive.
>
> (I forgot to mention one important thing in my previous response)
>
> I also strongly believe, *based on my implementation experience*, that
> the implementation complexity of DHCPv6 for host configuration is
> *not* prohibitive.
Sorry, my opinion on complexity of DHCPv6 may be a bit subjective and not objective.
:+(
> Of course, this is just a subjective impression,
> but I believe the implementation complexity should be measured by
> implementors, not (mainly) by protocol designers who do not implement
> it.
Yes I agree with you, and the complexity measurement should also be done by users ;+)
Regards
Luc
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
> Corporate R&D Center,
> Toshiba Corp.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> #-------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
