>>>>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:51:34 -0500,
>>>>> Rob Austein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The question to the WG here is not "Do you agree that DHCPv6-Lite is
> the best choice?" (we know that some would disagree with that), but
> rather "Do you agree that this is the sense of the WG?"
A quick check: what exactly do you mean by "DHCPv6-Lite"?
1. a "stateless" subset of the current DHCPv6, as specified in
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-01.txt
2. an extension to the current DHCPv6 that has the ability to
multicast the stateless information (that I guess Alain first
proposed)
3. others
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
