1. a "stateless" subset of the current DHCPv6, as specified in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-01.txt 2. an extension to the current DHCPv6 that has the ability to multicast the stateless information (that I guess Alain first proposed)
(i). In what way is DHCPv6-lite insufficient?
DHCPv6-lite has no way to inform a DNS recursing server renumbering.
That is a good reason to use well known addresses not affected by renumbering.
Masataka Ohta
#---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
