On 9-Jan-2007, at 07:14, Brett Carr wrote:
The RIPE NCC will also be soon kicking off a project to check
delegations
from RIPE>LIR's in the reverse tree. You can see the details here.
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/dns-lameness.html
I think similar work is being undertaken in APNIC which I'm sure
George
may be able to comment on.
APNIC started their lame delegation trial some years ago (back when I
used to show up for APNIC meetings, even); I believe all that stuff
has been in production for quite a while, now.
I think the fact that policies can and do exist to encourage reverse
delegations should be mentioned in this draft.
I think the actions of a registry in detecting and acting upon lame
delegations from the zones under their stewardship are relevant to
the whole DNS, and not just to do with the in-addr.arpa or ip6.arpa
domains. As such, if the issues are to be documented, I'd prefer to
see them described in a separate draft.
Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
