I note that yet _____again_____ you failed to offer any proof of your
assertions, but merely offer ad hominem attack on my criticism of your
repeated failure to provide proof while falsely stating contested
assertions as undisputed fact.
Your performance in this matter is clear for all to see by having done
the same trick now for a third time in a row, just as I cited.
Your childish ad hominem and attempts at ridicule are signs that
indicate an awareness of your own weakness. If you had facts, you would
cite them. But you don't, so you call names instead.
--Dean
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 14-Mar-2007, at 21:23, Dean Anderson wrote:
>
> > That is partly right: Several old threads where your assertion was
> > previously shown to be false.
>
> I don't think there's much benefit to the working group to be gained
> by responding to your message in any detail; the technical points
> have all been covered before, and the thinly-veiled inferences about
> my honesty and the alleged conspiracy amongst those in "my group"
> presumably sound about as ridiculous to everybody else as they do to me.
>
> To those who routinely send me private mail asking me to please not
> feed the troll, apologies. I'll try harder.
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
