> One other issue around DO is that it was introduced to signal "understanding" > of DNSSEC as per RFC 2535. The reaction of hypothetical 2535 only > resolvers to DNSSECbis responses is to be explored. I vaguely remember that > we've had this discussion of versioning the DO "bit".
It's not a issue with BIND 9.1 or BIND 9.2. They will just ignore the DNSSEC-4035 records. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop