Apologies for using a meaningful Subject: header....

On 10 Sep 2009, at 22:09, Paul Wouters wrote:

A TLD should do due diligence. I mean, its their core business. Its the
ONLY thing they should do right. Make sure theit zone file works.

True. Now please suggest how someone can perform that due diligence in circumstances where there are unknown (to them) actors between how they sign the zone and how others may or may not verify those signatures.

Even when this issue was found, they could have easilly added their old
key to the zone to ensure DLV would work until it got updated.

That's not the issue. [Let's leave aside the bizarre logic of "after you've had your heart transplant, keep the old, diseased one handy in case you might have to go back to it one day"."] Anyone lodging keys with the ITAR has no formal knowledge whatsoever over who is slurping data from the ITAR or what they might be doing with that data. Or who depends on whatever flavour of the month trust anchor that third party may have constructed. AFAICT there are no (service level) agreements underpinning these arrangements.

Rather than consider this in the abstract, let's now look at the specifics. Is there an agreement between .pr and IANA about the ITAR? Probably. I don't know. Does anyone retrieving data from the ITAR have an agreement with IANA covering that? I very much doubt it. Has ISC told .pr "Be informed we're slurping your keys from the ITAR and feeding them to our DLV engine. This happens once a day/week/whatever. Bear this in mind if you ever roll a key"? I doubt it. Is there an agreement or written understanding between .pr and ISC on how both parties will behave wrt publishing or rotating .pr's keys? Probably not. IIUC ISC provides its DLV service under a best-efforts, hold harmless basis and there are no agreements between ISC and those using its DLV service.

So is it any surprise that Bad Things happen if a zone signer has to take into account someone else's processes and procedures that they don't know anything about whenever they do a key rollover?

Reality is, there is only on DLV they need to worry about.

Prove it.

FYI, there have been occasional postings on bind-users about how to use and set up DLV. So some people have been playing with it. They might even have it working behind a campus/corporate firewall.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to