On 22 Mar 2010, at 19:30, Alfred HÎnes wrote: >> I do think that it belongs in dnsext rather than dnsop - did you >> decide to move based on feedback from the working group chairs? > > Shane, > at least _my_ argument was an encouragement to consider whether > (or not) the underlying problem could/should be better addressed > under the umbrella of the nameserver management protocol effort > in DNSOP (i.e. _not_ in-band in the DNS protocol). > > If that makes sense, the topic falls into the bailiwick of DNSOP. > > Thus it seems a good idea to discuss the problem statement in DNSOP > before deciding which road to go with a solution.
I think this is exactly right. Johan _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
