On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:09:21PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > You can ignore the option and talk to the DNS server of your preference. You > can also choose to listen for the option only from one or more trusted > sources. >
I'm really unclear about this "trusted sources" thing, though. Is that "trust only if you're on a trusted network"? Because I think the problem basically is that there's no sDHCP, right? > A bare name would unlikely find match from the suffix list. You could ask > resolution for the bare name from your favorite default. > > After appending the bare name with some suffix from your search list you > could look for match from DNS server selection list. > > Of course there could be multiple search list from different interfaces. In > such case you could prioritize the search lists by some means and start > walking through the suffixes when resolving bare name. > This is all a little hand-wavy. "Some means" sounds like the road to user-surprise-perdition. Bare names are already a bugbear, and I don't think we want to make them even more surprising. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
