I have read previous versions of the draft, and skimmed this one looking at the changes. I agree that the document is (almost) ready to go.
On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > > Questions: > > c) should the DPS have a section describing if/when/how a zone (i.e. > the one covered by the DPS) goes to unsigned? > I agree, adding this will improve the doc. > d) Should the DPS have a section describing the zone's policy as how to > perform an algorithm rollover ? > what I'm in particular looking for is in particular how long the zone > expects to be signed by both algorithms. > There might be a variety of reasons that a zone may want to roll the algorithm(s) in use and that reason may dictate the length of time both algorithms are used. So I don't think it's the best idea. Scott > Olafur > > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop =================================== Scott Rose NIST [email protected] +1 301-975-8439 Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671 http://www.dnsops.gov/ =================================== _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
