-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Fredrik,

On 06/24/2011 11:27 PM, Fredrik Ljunggren wrote:
> 
> On 2011-06-24, at 01:41, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
> 
>> I like to see Key Signing (KS) and Zone Signing (ZS) as a role of a
>> key.
> 
> Agreed, although I prefer the term "key type" rather than "role", as
> "role" may be confused the controls surrounding personnel and
> "trusted roles".

That's fine with me.

Best regards,

Matthijs

> 
>> I propose the following changes:
> 
> I like the idea of merging the subsections covering key roll-overs.
> 
>> I think these are fairly small changes and makes a Single Type
>> Signing Scheme fit more into the framework.
> 
> I agree with the only remark to as calling it key types, rather than
> roles. If there are no objections I'll incorporate these and Olafur's
> suggested changes shortly and submit a -05 version of the draft.
> 
> -- Fredrik
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOCOqzAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5l/oIANKXFmJ6IS7gTbPEua/kgSna
iDGfWJ8mflwxqzSEwswayyhwihy0LtsPCUqREvYC/nUQwYC+M04aSWOTg9Mfit0X
NzlpiUlqnw84N5eh7vW7s14Na9zj1gW93EnA1utHFTM2LwWdKCAw/icsZ7eWxZjN
6CcuKjJRx+YRobD3+asDJA4ExEJE4z6nE1GknAA4OzkJ0iOfBLYtTfKxjF6wPSZQ
XmaqNr3L1nJzlBIgvPxbE0vXmAelwCGNzX/22bivzcp0MC1Xt14hZL0yKSLWe74+
UXdbsI57e4d91tN4gVErG19kXFHyd2RX8re/MK+9RDhZygywdrYhdzUJZLpdShM=
=a4Lf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to