Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Take a look at Section
> 5 of the draft and you will see a rather long list of specs that have
> defined their own registries for this namespace, either implicitly or
> explicitly.
That's definitely what we should not do.
> It's difficult to imagine a stronger basis for working towards a common
> registration mechanism.
We already have more than enough registration mechanisms.
> This group is the natural home for this work.
You'd better worry about registration mechanisms for file name
extensions.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
