On 2/11/2012 5:25 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > >> I think that starting work on such a draft is a great idea -BUT- in the mean >> time >> do not let "perfect" get in the way of "good enough". > Just to be clear: a good handful of people, me included, have said that the > wording in the current doc is not good enough, or only good enough if you > squint hard. It is clearly much worse than the document that this is supposed > to replace.
wearing my rfc 2010 co-author hat: +1. paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
