On Feb 14, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > I would assume that someone who has a concern about root server operations > will ask each RSO if their server meets or exceeds the requirements in > RFC2870bis and if the answer is no, they'll ask why not.
And if no acceptable answer is provided? Sorry, rhetorical question: can't stop myself from kicking the brown stain that used to be a dead horse. > That said, it's good to update and revise those guidelines from time to time. > IMO the value of this document is to describe the general principles and > suggest to others how an "important" DNS server should be operated. For > instance, it can (and has) been used in RFPs for DNS service for TLDs. I agree, however I'd think a better approach would be to write a BCP for "important" DNS servers, not a document that sets up false expectations or assumptions. Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
