On 14 Feb 2012, at 17:20, David Conrad wrote:
That said, it's good to update and revise those guidelines from
time to time. IMO the value of this document is to describe the
general principles and suggest to others how an "important" DNS
server should be operated. For instance, it can (and has) been used
in RFPs for DNS service for TLDs.
I agree, however I'd think a better approach would be to write a BCP
for "important" DNS servers, not a document that sets up false
expectations or assumptions.
+1
Though until that comes along RFC2870(bis) is probably the best hammer-
shaped object for that nail-shaped problem.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
