>I read the draft and like the direction of it.
>It looks like you are proposing turning off a validation for domain by
>the negative trust anchor.

Correct

>An alternative is to insert a negative trust anchor for a particular
>trust anchor.

Do you mean when an alternative trust anchor is used by a validating
resolver? Like the ITAR or the ISC DLV trust anchor (or for other islands
where the TLD is not signed)?

>In the first case there is an action required by the validator operator
>to remove the negative trust anchor,
>but in the second case once an
>alternate trust anchor is available then the domain starts validating
>again.

HmmmŠ So who takes the action to create or remove the (temporary?)
alternate trust anchor?

- Jason



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to