Griffiths, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 10, 2012, at 8:11 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > > Suggested rewrite: > > > > Furthermore, a Negative Trust Anchor MUST only be used for a > > short duration, perhaps for a day or less. > > Agreed. Maximum time supported makes sense to me.
This only makes sense if the negative trust anchor is for a third party domain. There are situations where it makes sense to use negative trust anchors covering your own domains, and these might be necessary for a long period of time (because that would require a difficult upgrade or extensive renaming). There are more use cases than just the NASA screwup scenario. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Shannon, Southwest Rockall: Northwesterly 5 or 6. Rough or very rough. Rain or showers. Moderate or good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
