On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Peter Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> the topic of AS112 has been addresses in the DNSOP WG resulting in
> RFCs 6304 and 6305 and is also related to 'local zones' as described in
> RFC 6303.
>
> The question of extending AS112 service to IPv6 (as in "transport")
> as well as the maintainability of the list of zones served by AS112
> systems has been discussed before. We have a proposal in
>
> draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-01.txt
>
> to make the AS112 served zone set extendable in the future.
> Please read the draft and state whether you think this is something
> the WG - and you in particular - would want to work on. We'd like to
> find five volunteers for thorough document reviews to support the
> draft going forward - provided the overall response is positive.
>
> It is always very helpful if people could identify open questions in/w.r.t.
> the draft, but please don't forget to also state your opinion on adoption.
>
> Please respond by the end of next week, so that we could ask future
> editors to submit a renamed -00 version by Monday, Feb 18.
And just a note:
The last day for submission of a -00 is Feb18th, but the last day for adoption
was the 11th.
So, if this is adopted, the authors can resubmit with a new name, but it
approved till the cycle restarts…
• 2013-02-11 (Monday): Working Group Chair approval for initial
document (Version -00) submissions appreciated by UTC 24:00.
• 2013-02-18 (Monday): Internet Draft Cut-off for initial document
(-00) submission by UTC 24:00, upload using IETF ID Submission Tool.
W
>
> Thanks,
> Peter & Stephen
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
--
What our ancestors would really be thinking, if they were alive today, is: "Why
is it so dark in here?"
-- (Terry Pratchett, Pyramids)
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
