I'd like to be able to implement this with a standard authority server, no
special code, just a root zone that's empty other than its apex. So please no
requirements for the soa other than that it be at or above the qname.
Paul
Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:57 AM, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> if we can't return nxdomain, then i'm opposed to the omniscient spec,
>> and we should continue as before, enumerating on the responding
>servers
>> every zone to which we wish to delegate.
>>
>
>If the WG consensus is NXDOMAIN, we can do that. *We* felt that NOERROR
>was more appropriate, but 'its entirely possible we are wrong.
>
>W
>
>(If folk feel sufficiently strongly we *could* even strip a label off,
>so that the synthesized SOA is not the same as the NXD. *This* feel
>really hacks, but putting it out there...)
>> noerror/nodata is the wrong answer.
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>
>--
>"I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to
>understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language
>devised for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry
>Prachett
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
