On Feb 25, 2013, at 4:52 PM, SM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > At 14:35 24-02-2013, Joe Abley wrote: >> The most recent decision that I saw from the chairs was that it should >> not be adopted. I do not agree that that is the best path forward. > > The draft might have crossed the review threshold after the deadline. > Authors are usually given an opportunity to cross that threshold. That tends > to fail when there isn't adequate socialization. >
Yup -- the call for adoption on Saturday the 9th, and ended on Monday the 18th, which was a public holiday / long weekend in the USA. This means that US folk only had 4 or 5 working days to read and comment. If it had been run for the more traditional 2 weeks (and if folk had realized that they specifically had to state that they would be a reviewer) thing might have gone differently. But yes, fully agree that we could have socialized this better…. W > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > -- It is impossible to sharpen a pencil with a blunt axe. It is equally vain to try to do it with ten blunt axes instead. -- E.W Dijkstra, 1930-2002 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
