I will try to organize a face to face meeting on the topic of moving DNS
delegation information in-band (inside DNS)
from child to parent, at the IETF next week (will send out report after
meeting)
If you are interested in attending let me know and in general what times are
good for you,
Olafur
On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2013-03-05, at 15:01, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Joe Abley wrote:
>>
>>> I presume this has already come up, and there are good reasons why the
>>> apparent lexical flexibility in what I'm about to suggest are swamped by a
>>> sea of vicious snakes, but if the goal is "transmitting general information
>>> to the parent which in some cases they might care about" why not think
>>> about a more general RRType of the form
>>>
>>> ; zone cut
>>> example.com. IN SOA ...
>>> ;
>>> example.com. IN PARENT DS parental-hints.example.com. example.com.
>>> example.com. IN PARENT A ns1.example.com. ns1.example.com.
>>
>> I'm very nervous about such a fundamental zone syntax change. It's going
>> to take forever for zone tools to take up on this.
>
> Every new RR is a zone syntax change.
>
>> It would be better to use a non-IN class PARENT
>>
>> example.com. PARENT DS parental-hints.example.com. example.com.
>
> If the record is not in the same class, then it's not in the same zone. That
> route takes us back to Vixie metazones.
>
>
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
