On Apr 23, 2013, at 12:07, Paul Wouters wrote: > There are many very sane CC:TLDs out there too.
The point is that there are arrangements where you can't talk directly. And there are arrangements were you can talk directly. And there are arrangements where the lingua franca is DNSKEY and not DS. There are many environments. That is why I'm fighting a one-size fits all, in-band only solution. > I believe in the free market. I recommend gkg.net as a registrar because > they do allow me to send JSON requests to them for DS updates of my > domains. So let's not use marketing arguments for protocol design. I have a hard time not saying this sarcastically - yeah, let's ignore reality. "Marketing" and "market forces" determine our requirements. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 There are no answers - just tradeoffs, decisions, and responses.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
