Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Except that this thread has brought out many problems in the -01 draft > that will likely result in changes that will make CDS special, not just > like other records. At that point, you will have to decide if having a > CDS record is a better idea than just re-using DS.
Re-using DS simply won't work, because you can't specify which side of the zone cut to query when the child and parent are on the same server. >From the point of view of name servers and resolvers, CDS is not special. It is slightly special for signers, and the parent update systems that consumes CDS records need slightly special validators. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
