Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> writes: > Op 24-04-13 15:18, Wes Hardaker schreef: > >> + operate on a single record at a time (publish this DS, don't >> touch the rest) > > I don't understand the rationale behind this one. > Can someone please explain to me? > > I would think a child knows what "the rest" is at all time, and it's > best for him to have that oversight before he changes anything. > What am I missing, unknown standby keys?
Well, I agree: you should be able to say "publish this list" and have it be the entire set. But others have indicated (in random conversations) they want to be able to distinctly say do this or that. I suspect that it would be fine to bulk-publish a list for most people, however. But the one caveat is that if we end up adding a hold-down time, and you want to make another (but different) change half way through the hold-down time then your only choice is to restart entirely or wait. But it depends on what the hold down is watching too. The real requirement could probably be better worded to indicate some sort of independence between add/remove operations. -- Wes Hardaker Parsons _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
