On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Warren Kumari wrote:
Anyway, we have finally rev'ed the CDS draft, and have (I think) arrived at a
compromise that will be acceptable to both views (DS vs DNSKEY).
The 50'000ft[0] view is that the record is now a selector and a data part.
If the selector is 0, the data is a DS record.
It if is not 0, the data is a DNSKEY, and the parent should calculate the DS
from that.
(This is largely based upon ideas like that described above. )
This allows children to present DS to those parents who want DS, and DNSKEY to
those who would prefer to calculate DS on their children's behalf.
I still strongly prefer CDS (and CDNSKEY) to keep the record formats
identical, making things a lot easier on implementors and humans editing
zone files. I see no strong reason to merge these two things into one
RRTYPE of CTA.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
