On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Warren Kumari wrote:
Ok, I just want to make completely sure I understand (so I make sure that I'm
correctly capturing things in the draft).
We would have 2 RRs, one of CDS and one of CDNSKEY.
CDS is as described in the earlier version of the doc.
example.com. 86400 IN CDS 31589 8 1 3490A6806D47F17A34C29E2CE80E8A999FFBE4BE
and CDNSKEY is:
example.com. 86400 IN CDNSKEY 57 3 8
AwEAAeikvxboZpn9VCxm3YDLHo40SvA9EmRwJHHQyJ0OCzrQSRBSipoj
rW7yESXWiDDyzflS8rgzDs7M3fIdSduOdyNi55DmXPdkS8HYORTMNyzF
sSOg+xx6tUySK2p4WAhlbsJNLz4IkQCek59NoDBOLyQ15npsr7Tgfb/H
HU7zmCMvnxh0SqO2lyhnQfk29Thc3nC4KNJNb3drjWKOuCw5mg+2GrEZ
Yc/VqdeGvrOCQ2el8jWZpSU5cxb7EdEy4B9nEeZiBpHXaZ5XJ+ewi4vm
cUK5/445mGJqV4rDeicy5/ShC/BJ81v3bIRPWebvDRJmDbjr2d9MnLXU E7yyETrQd18=
Parents who want DS poll (or whatever) for CDS, parents who want DNSKEY poll
(or whatever) for CDNSKEY.
Hopefully I'm understanding, because this seems much cleaner, simpler and more
elegant than the CTA stuff that I described.
So, is this what folk would like? If not, apologies for being dim...
Yes.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
