Ted, On Feb 17, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > If dnsop wants to do this work, that's fine.
Given the various topics being discussed in DNSOP and the relatively high interest/reviews/comments/etc being shown, I think DNSOP is working fine. > Unfortunately, the dysfunction will arise wherever DNS improvements are > suggested, so not trying to fix it is not an option. And of course I > realize that many good IETF contributors have been ground to a nubbin trying > to fix the aforementioned dysfunction, and have no particular reason to think > I would have been more able to fix it than my predecessors. Given experiences, I have to wonder if the whole idea of a long-term working group just leads to dysfunction -- perhaps the IETF version of an echo chamber (or perhaps even inbreeding). Perhaps a better approach would be to use something like DNSOP which has an operations bent is use to see if there are ideas/interest in particular topics that can drive the creation of working groups that focus on the specific DNS-related issues? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
