On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:39:58PM -0400, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > >> operated on Internet networks. This will include root zone >> name servers, TLD name servers, name servers for other DNS >> zones, iterative DNS resolvers, and recursive DNS resolvers. > > Is there a reason to call out these particular functions, or not to > include something like, "or any other resolver or server functioning > as part of the global DNS"? I'm just worried, for instance, that > stubs don't appear there, even though there might be advice I can > imagine the WG providing. +1 to at least calling out stub resolvers, but Andrew's non-list formulation is better. >> manages, and how they will interact moving forward. Work in a >> liaison capacity to ICANN to assist in this. > > Given that "liaison" is a term of art around the IETF, perhaps the > latter sentence needs to be phrased another way? I'm not sure exactly > what you have in mind, or I'd suggest something. Let me be more blunt than Andrew: an IETF WG cannot work as a "liaison" to anyone. The IETF has liaisons to ICANN (and bless them for doing that somewhat thankless task!). ICANN should not expect that any WG would be a direct point of contact for ICANN work at all. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
