On Apr 3, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote:
> Understood that wordsmithing is needed, and getting the wording right is an > important detail, but I think we're even more interested in whether the item > should be there at all: should DNSOP, in appropriate collaboration with all > relevant parties by whatever mechanism applies, be taking on special > names/RFC 6761 issues? In all seriousness, the WG might not get a choice. I've heard from two folks in the I* leadership that they're watching our threads. I replied to both of them that I thought that might not be a good idea, but they indicated that it was better than it being done in the smoke-filled telechats. Having said that, I would be happy to propose ripping that out of our charter. Yes, we're all into politics and such (and law...), but we don't offer much expertise other than "yes, there is a difference between these different places that should block or resolve those names". --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
