-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 op 04-04-14 10:59, Stephane Bortzmeyer schreef:
> same) and I dislike even more "DNS-like names", which seems to > imply there are inferior names. www.foobar.local is a domain name, > even if it is not resolved through the DNS. I tend to disagree to this marketing definition of a domain name. For me, a domain name is a name that consists of labels seperated by a dot that is resolvable through the DOMAIN name system. Any name that consists of labels seperated by dots but is not present in a domain name system is just that: A name with dots in them. Maybe that same name scheme is used in other protocols as well, but that does not make a name a domain name. I don't considder these other names with dots in them inferior, but they are simply not domain names. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 M: +31 6 23368970 Mailto: [email protected] XMPP: [email protected] HTTP://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTPqtKAAoJEDqHrM883Agnd3cH/0q+hZ6q7gmBF73GGTORUkt7 uOphjZs3hEr0d4n29NVc6Un06Bx3nxQa3bD+HwlZgObwklI5BafXqsUyRYkY5qWA 5Ik/T1O5U9/sjKnWv5bL790yObKeY4WYR1O9teCDVU4IBmockK2is33bXQ2sW/7S O/wZnE6kU3pYcPCrjmrUCGagvCYHRWEa4yUvq7gaMop/hDnqswhIxvp+MDPHx7fE D4mTtVZTY73WwwtmrC/ayIYUg5sXyODeQOZjo2Re8cJG3rtqgYkzmVTy7hNh69a6 iCuLugKYFensweHFwgu55EUHFcf3IwfO2TpdSZvRVYCDTxP9/F5qE4bMgabXsOo= =8KYt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
