On Apr 4, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't considder these other names with dots in them inferior, but
> they are simply not domain names.

Whether you are right or not, I think Stephane's interpretation is technically 
correct.   I don't mean that it _is_, I just mean that I think it is.   So we 
aren't going to get to the truth of the matter by casting slogans at each 
other, because it's just a matter of opinion.   It's not wrong to describe the 
names the way Stephane has, and it's not wrong to describe them the way you 
have.   So we should choose based on what meaning more clearly expresses the 
policy we ultimately decide on, rather than trying to drive the policy choice 
on the basis of what name we prefer.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to