I wanted to echo this. I hadn’t been so detailed in my review... On Apr 7, 2014, at 1:29, Masataka Ohta <[email protected]> wrote:
> I feel terminology of "agent" in the draft is annoying. I strongly agree with that. Parental “Agent” is too broad. > "parent > zone" or "parent zone administrator" should be more consistent > with the terminology of rfc1034. The latter term is closer, but “administration.” However, I don’t think the original RFCs gave much consideration to “how the data was assembled for the zone” so I wouldn’t stick to only those terms. Parent Provisioning System is more in line with operational terminology, it would be a component of the Parent Zone Administration. I know that the use of “provisioning” isn’t commonplace, it’s what I’ve become used to seeing. Perhaps there’s a better term for that. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
