Matthijs Mekking <matth...@nlnetlabs.nl> writes: > 1. Introduction, last paragraph. > To me, the mentioning of not addressing DNSSEC bootstrapping comes out > the blue. One sentence later it mentions it is not intended for DNSSEC > synchronization at all. I'd prefer a rewrite of this last paragraph: > > "This specification was not designed to synchronize DNSSEC > security records, such as DS RRsets. For such a solution, see the > complimentary solution [REF] for maintaining security delegation > information. In addition, this specification does not address how > to perform bootstrapping operations, including to get the required > initial DNSSEC-secured operating environment in place."
I've used your wording, thank you for it! I'll get to your other comments a bit later. -- Wes Hardaker Parsons _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
