Hi
I have read through this and would support its progress. A reminder for
the record would not be a bad idea I think.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
Can we please move on this.
The reverse address are not yet insecurely delegated as
would be required for RFC 6598 compliance. This is starting
to cause operational problems for ISP's that validate DNS
responses as they can't deploy local IN-ADDR.ARPA zones
until that insecure delegation is done.
Also should I add a reminder to the IANA Considerations that
the insecure delegation needs to be performed?
e.g.
"IANA is reminded that a insecure delegation for these zones
is required for compliance with RFC 6598 to break the DNSSEC
chain of trust."
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
