Mark,
Surely, something stronger than a reminder is appropriate.
For a mission-critical requirement, this needs to be an explicit and
unambiguous request:
"This document directs IANA to create insecure delegations
for the listed zones."
Dick
________________________
On 14 August 2014 01:16, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can we please move on this.
>
> The reverse address are not yet insecurely delegated as
> would be required for RFC 6598 compliance. This is starting
> to cause operational problems for ISP's that validate DNS
> responses as they can't deploy local IN-ADDR.ARPA zones
> until that insecure delegation is done.
>
> Also should I add a reminder to the IANA Considerations that
> the insecure delegation needs to be performed?
>
> e.g.
>
> "IANA is reminded that a insecure delegation for these zones
> is required for compliance with RFC 6598 to break the DNSSEC
> chain of trust."
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
