On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > I strongly support the adoption of this document by the WG and will review it > during its process.
I didn't see the CfA email, so randomly replying here. Yes, this looks useful. Support adoption and will review. W > > --Paul Hoffman > > Abstract: > This document updates the requirements for the support of TCP as a > transport protocol for DNS implementations. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis-00 > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
