Warren, There wasn't one, yet, since we've been trying to make sure there's actual interest in a document before asking for the formal commitment to it.
But as you probably saw it's on the agenda in HI and we'll be looking for interest/reviewers/etc. then. The interest already expressed is noted, your offers to do work will not be forgotten :-) thanks, Suzanne On Oct 27, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I strongly support the adoption of this document by the WG and will review >> it during its process. > > I didn't see the CfA email, so randomly replying here. > > Yes, this looks useful. Support adoption and will review. > W > >> >> --Paul Hoffman >> >> Abstract: >> This document updates the requirements for the support of TCP as a >> transport protocol for DNS implementations. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis-00 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
