I support adoption because operators are using this spec. I plan to review and also to encourage a few others who have reviews to contribute.
On 28 October 2014 08:50, Suzanne Woolf <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear DNSOP WG, > > This draft documents the specification, use, and cautions regarding the > "client-subnet" EDNS option. Please consider adoption of this draft as a WG > work item. > > As some of you will remember, this is a successor to a draft that was > considered in DNSEXT some time ago and eventually expired without formal > action. Since then, the option codepoint has been granted under the > appropriate registry policy (expert review) and the option is in > significant operational use. > > The topic has come up more than once on the WG mailing list, with some > vigorous discussion, so a couple of the original authors and a couple of > new people have revived the draft in the interests of documenting the > option, including specific behavior and cautions in its use. > > The draft is available here: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet/ > > Please review to see if you think this document is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP and comment to the list. > > Please state your view, your reasons, and (if you're in favor of adoption) > whether you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends Tuesday 11-Nov.-2014, end of the day wherever > you happen to be. This is the same day as our WG meeting at IETF 91. > > > Thanks, > Suzanne Woolf > DNSOP co-chair > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
