The WG adopted this document some time ago (the announcement to the list is dated Nov. 14, 2014).
It now needs reviewers to review and authors to revise. If you agreed to review it earlier, or even if you didn't but you're interested, please do. Authors, any feedback on the reviews/comments so far? thanks, Suzanne On Feb 12, 2015, at 8:01 PM, "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/12/15, 2:51 PM, "Mark Delany" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tap tap tap. Is this thing turned on? >> >> I think 3-4 people made some well-considered feedback on this draft, but >> there has been zero discussion or author feedback for some six weeks now. >> >> Does that mean there is insufficient interest in progressing this draft? > > I don¹t think so. I, for one, support adoption and hope the WG does so and > moves on. This one is important and can actually positively improve the > experience of end users of the Internet, which is a really good thing and > something DNSOP should do more often. :-) > >> I ask because in my dayjob we've been recently approached by some >> large eyeball providers who are now willing to invest in upgrading >> their resolver infrastructure to support client-subnet now that they see >> the benefits. > > Awesome! :-) > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
